Pope Francis Critical Of Those Who Have Pets Over Children
Who is Pope Francis to criticize people for having pets instead of children? Sir, have a global view of seats. If we're honest, some people shouldn't have children because many parents are deadbeats; they would rather be their child(ren)'s friend or some aren't in their lives at all. You can't bring children into the world & leave them to fend for themselves. What Pope Francis fails to realize is that some people have good reasons for not having children. One, some parents can't afford to have children. Let's be real, raising kids isn't cheap, especially if you want to give them a better life than what you had. Factor in sports, food & healthcare, plus private education and you're talking tens of thousands annually, which doesn't include higher education. Two: Depending on the parents' age & genetic background, the risk of disability is higher for parents with a family history of a medical issue. Some parents understand this and choose not to bring children into the world because of the high risk of their child being born with special needs, and because some of them may not be strong enough to deal with having a special needs child. This world is not nice to special needs/disabled people. There are some special needs/disabled people who live independent lives, but what about those who may always need help with daily living? Three, as the article says: Some people don't want children, and that's ok. Not everyone is obligated to have children. Yes, children are a blessing if they're raised right, but times are different now. Looking at the state of society, I told myself I'm not bringing children into this toilet we call the world. I have my reason(s), and they're not up for debate. Last but not least, some people enjoy the company of pets over children, did the Pope ever consider that?
No comments:
Post a Comment