This is too good NOT to share.
"GAME"
Ladies,
Some women have a negative connotation attached to the word "game." If a man is so-called "running game" on you, that's perceived as negative. The phrase "game recognizes game" can go either way. And, if someone is "lacing you with game" that's a good thing. Game is, simply put, the skill or knowledge you have or acquire in reference to dealing with the opposite sex. As far as I'm concerned, men as well as women need to have "game." As a matter of fact, women that don't have "game" many times end up with men that don't have any, otherwise known as simps. Simps are not quality men and simps are not leaders. Every male is not necessarily a man and every man is not necessarily a leader. A woman that doesn't have any "game" will not be able to identify a man that is lacking "game." If the man that you are getting to know or have recently began dating does not possess the attributes of a quality man, don't continue with the relationship. Charge him to the "game." This is the exact same philosophy that a man should use if he finds out that you are not a quality woman that doesn't know her role. Ladies, there's nothing wrong with "game" when used in the right way. Having "game" keeps you ahead of the "game" and may prevent you from being "charged to the game."
ℓσтυѕ
Ladies,
Some women have a negative connotation attached to the word "game." If a man is so-called "running game" on you, that's perceived as negative. The phrase "game recognizes game" can go either way. And, if someone is "lacing you with game" that's a good thing. Game is, simply put, the skill or knowledge you have or acquire in reference to dealing with the opposite sex. As far as I'm concerned, men as well as women need to have "game." As a matter of fact, women that don't have "game" many times end up with men that don't have any, otherwise known as simps. Simps are not quality men and simps are not leaders. Every male is not necessarily a man and every man is not necessarily a leader. A woman that doesn't have any "game" will not be able to identify a man that is lacking "game." If the man that you are getting to know or have recently began dating does not possess the attributes of a quality man, don't continue with the relationship. Charge him to the "game." This is the exact same philosophy that a man should use if he finds out that you are not a quality woman that doesn't know her role. Ladies, there's nothing wrong with "game" when used in the right way. Having "game" keeps you ahead of the "game" and may prevent you from being "charged to the game."
ℓσтυѕ
