A married man actually put a sex clause in his prenuptial agreement that states: I have the right to get sex elsewhere if my wife doesn't sex me on demand. When I think of prenups, I think of financial arrangements that state both parties enter & leave with what they came. Sex on demand is new to me in prenups because I've never heard of a couple putting this clause in a prenup. This has to be a fake question. If they've already signed it and are already married, why is he asking opinions? He wants co-signers. She shouldn't have signed no crap like that. Of course, everyone has a right to say what they will (not) put up with, but is there anything in the pre-nup that benefits her?! What about cases of illness, etc? What's he going do when she starts menopause and her sex drive drops? He sounds foolish. Why not worry about the reason she's not interested in sexing him, and correct that? That's too much like right because usually when a woman refuses to sex her man, it's for multiple reasons that are within or out of her control.
That's the dumbest thing I've read, and if she signed something so demeaning, she should take a few bucks and buy some self esteem, and a self help book.Why did he get married if his goal is to cheat? What happened to a union and understanding? I'm hoping he wrote this for shock value. What if he becomes severely disabled or impotent, can she go elsewhere to have her needs fulfilled? If the answer is no, then he's selfish. If yes, then again I ask why would he get married? I have two thoughts: He's worried about the wrong thing; perhaps he should study the definition of marriage because he has no clue. Marriage is about much more than "sex." It's about BOTH parties bringing out the best in each other. Second, he's foolish if he thinks this is going to stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment