This is the mess I don't like. A woman who has children out of wedlock gets to decide who will raise the kids. This should serve as a wake-up call to all men, to keep their sausage in their pants, because this law is yet another advantage to women. Out of spite, a woman could withhold her children from their biological father, and it would be hard for him to get custody of his child(ren). One of my Facebook friends was right when he said that laws are slighted towards men, because they are. Anyone who doesn't think so, is living in La La land. If a man screws up, it goes harder on him than it does the woman. A man loses his professional licenses/certifications, wages garnished, jail time, child support, etc. Let a woman screw up and she gets a slap on the wrist. I was so mad when I read this story, I had to do a blog commentary on it. What if hubby doesn't want to raise another man's child, then what? These tricks make me sick. It's not one, but two men getting screwed. After reading the story, this is nothing new. When full authority is placed in the mother's hands, it won't bode well for the father, and the child. The past 40+ years is proof of that. “She was a great woman, very attractive, very intelligent, fun loving, and easy going,” says Grimes. The keyword is WAS, which is past tense. This action revealed her true colors, and I hope this man learned a valuable lesson: All that glitters isn't gold. At the same time, it's hard for me to have compassion for him because he knew she was married, AND...she had the law on her side. In custody battles, they almost always favor the woman so it behooves these men to keep it in their pants. Stories like this give men more ammunition not to get married, because the law is slighted towards them.
No comments:
Post a Comment